Conceptualizing Moral Panic through a Moral Economy of Harm
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper explicates a critical theory of moral panic, arguing that there is an af nity to be discerned between the sociology of moral panic and the sociology of moral regulation. It is demonstrated how efforts to distance sociological investigations of moral regulation from studies of moral panic have been founded on a narrow treatment of the ways in which the latter have conceptualized panics uncritically as irrational societal overreactions stemming from some variant of ‘social anxiety.’ Advocating a conceptualization which attends to the complexity of ways in which human conduct is governed, explanatory importance is situated in Valverde’s formulation of ‘moral capital,’ showing how her model not only enables a fusion between a political economy of the state and ethical subjectivity, but more crucial between panics and regulatory projects through the production of a moral economy of harm.
منابع مشابه
On Folk Devils, Moral Panics and New Wave Public Health
New wave public health places an emphasis on exhorting individuals to engage in healthy behaviour with good health being a signifier of virtuous moral standing, whereas poor health is often associated with personal moral failings. In effect, the medical is increasingly being collapsed into the moral. This approach is consistent with other aspects of contemporary neolibe...
متن کاملThe Cultural Politics of Contemporary Moral Panic Studies: Refl ections on a Changing Research Agenda
The publication of Fitzgerald and Smoczynski’s article on societal reactions to polish labour migrants in the United Kingdom provides an important opportunity to refl ect on theoretical and conceptual advances that have been made in the sociology of moral panic. Conventional perspectives conceptualise panic episodes as exceptional rather than ordinary claims-making activities that amplify devia...
متن کاملThe Unifying Moral Dyad: Liberals and Conservatives Share the Same Harm-Based Moral Template.
Do moral disagreements regarding specific issues (e.g., patriotism, chastity) reflect deep cognitive differences (i.e., distinct cognitive mechanisms) between liberals and conservatives? Dyadic morality suggests that the answer is "no." Despite moral diversity, we reveal that moral cognition--in both liberals and conservatives--is rooted in a harm-based template. A dyadic template suggests that...
متن کاملAnti-Polish Migrant Moral Panic in the UK: Rethinking Employment Insecurities and Moral Regulation*
This article examines British societal reactions to Polish migrant workers using a framework that combines recent developments of the moral panic concept informed by the sociology of moral regulation and risk governance studies. Given the multi-mediated nature of contemporary moral panics and in contrast to conventional analysis focusing on newspaper coverage this article is based on Polish mig...
متن کاملTo Catch a Predator
This paper is about moral panics over contemporary technology, which I call " technopanics. " I use two examples, the cyberporn panic of 1996 and the contemporary panic over online predators and MySpace, to demonstrate the links between media coverage and content legislation. In both cases, Internet content legislation is directly linked to media-fueled moral panics that concern uses of technol...
متن کامل